Helen Keller Intl
Supports vitamin A supplementation alongside broader nutrition and health work.
85% of weighted axes reviewed. A mechanism hypothesis, not proven effectiveness or a donation recommendation.
The proposed pathway
Nutrition delivery and capacity
Six dimensions, with rationale
Structural depth
2 / 4Micronutrient delivery can strengthen recurring health-service routines.
Institutional reach
3 / 4Works through government and community distribution channels.
Durability
1 / 4Supplementation must recur; it does not itself remove all causes of malnutrition.
Scalability
3 / 4Established distribution channels permit replication.
Funding additionality
UnreviewedUnknown: a current marginal funding gap, counterfactual and delivery capacity have not been audited.
Community agency
UnreviewedUnknown: decision rights and accountability to affected people have not been audited.
Evidence and selection
Independent program evaluation
GiveWell current top charity: vitamin A supplementation program. The linked source includes this organization or specified program within that stated scope. Review the evaluator's actual scope ↗
A testable next question
Supported delivery areas should maintain supplementation coverage and independently measured health gains.
Review confidence: Medium for mechanism; limited for systemic attribution. Documented intervention design; not a complete audit of this organization.
What remains uncertain
GiveWell's recommendation covers vitamin A supplementation. Wider nutrition programs require separate review.
Sources to inspect
- Helen Keller Intl — documented approach ↗
official · reviewed 2026-10-06 - GiveWell current top charity: vitamin A supplementation program ↗
evaluation · reviewed 2026-10-06
Propose a sourced correction →
Rubric v0.1 · 2026-10-06 · Method, conflicts and coverage