International Budget Partnership
Supports civil society and research on budget transparency, participation and accountability.
85% of weighted axes reviewed. A mechanism hypothesis, not proven effectiveness or a donation recommendation.
The proposed pathway
Public budget accountability
Six dimensions, with rationale
Structural depth
4 / 4Targets public-resource governance and budget decision rules.
Institutional reach
4 / 4Budget research and partners operate across countries.
Durability
3 / 4Public transparency and participation rules may persist if enforced.
Scalability
3 / 4Survey tools and civic methods can be reused.
Funding additionality
UnreviewedUnknown: a current marginal funding gap, counterfactual and delivery capacity have not been audited.
Community agency
UnreviewedUnknown: decision rights and accountability to affected people have not been audited.
Evidence and selection
Organization reported
Illustrative inclusion to examine this mechanism. Inclusion is not an external recommendation or a verified comparative ranking.
A testable next question
Budget reforms should increase meaningful participation and improve traceable public spending outcomes.
Review confidence: Low for systemic attribution; organization description only. Documented intervention design; not a complete audit of this organization.
What remains uncertain
Budget openness is an intermediate outcome; improved services and distribution require separate evidence.
Sources to inspect
- International Budget Partnership — documented approach ↗
official · reviewed 2026-10-06
Propose a sourced correction →
Rubric v0.1 · 2026-10-06 · Method, conflicts and coverage