Transparency International
Works through research, advocacy and a global movement to improve anti-corruption rules and accountability.
85% of weighted axes reviewed. A mechanism hypothesis, not proven effectiveness or a donation recommendation.
The proposed pathway
Anti-corruption institutions
Six dimensions, with rationale
Structural depth
4 / 4Targets governance rules and corruption incentives.
Institutional reach
4 / 4International networks and national chapters offer multi-jurisdiction reach.
Durability
3 / 4Legal and accountability reforms may persist but face capture and reversal.
Scalability
3 / 4Shared standards and tools can be adapted by local organizations.
Funding additionality
UnreviewedUnknown: a current marginal funding gap, counterfactual and delivery capacity have not been audited.
Community agency
UnreviewedUnknown: decision rights and accountability to affected people have not been audited.
Evidence and selection
Organization reported
Illustrative inclusion to examine this mechanism. Inclusion is not an external recommendation or a verified comparative ranking.
A testable next question
Reforms should improve independently measured accountability and reduce verified corruption risks.
Review confidence: Low for systemic attribution; organization description only. Documented intervention design; not a complete audit of this organization.
What remains uncertain
Perception indices do not directly measure corruption prevented. Chapters and legal entities differ.
Sources to inspect
- Transparency International — documented approach ↗
official · reviewed 2026-10-06
Propose a sourced correction →
Rubric v0.1 · 2026-10-06 · Method, conflicts and coverage