Systemic Altruism
← Back to the cohort
Poverty & opportunityPreliminary editorial review

Village Enterprise

Supports people in rural Africa with business grants, training, mentorship and savings groups.

Visit the organization ↗

Balanced systemic potential: 46–61/100
85% of weighted axes reviewed. A mechanism hypothesis, not proven effectiveness or a donation recommendation.

The proposed pathway

Livelihood graduation

Six dimensions, with rationale

Structural depth

2 / 4

Targets interacting household livelihood barriers rather than national economic rules.

Institutional reach

2 / 4

Focus is selected rural communities and partner programs.

Durability

2 / 4

Businesses, skills and savings may persist; shocks can reverse gains.

Scalability

3 / 4

A structured graduation package is replicable with mentors and targeting.

Funding additionality

Unreviewed

Unknown: a current marginal funding gap, counterfactual and delivery capacity have not been audited.

Community agency

Unreviewed

Unknown: decision rights and accountability to affected people have not been audited.

Evidence and selection

Organization reported

Illustrative inclusion to examine this mechanism. Inclusion is not an external recommendation or a verified comparative ranking.

A testable next question

Participant consumption and income gains should persist after grants and mentoring end.

Review confidence: Low for systemic attribution; organization description only. Documented intervention design; not a complete audit of this organization.

What remains uncertain

Organization description only in this seed; do not infer a current evaluator recommendation or lasting poverty elimination.

Sources to inspect

Propose a sourced correction →

Rubric v0.1 · 2026-10-06 · Method, conflicts and coverage